The technology of 3-dimensional (3D) image is now becoming the newest trend on the earth of TVs and monitors alike. The technology of digital actuality might present a partial learning experience, an intellectual expertise but not a human encounter. They did not have the kind of data that advanced science and technology has allowed us to have immediately; however I believe the pyramids are an example of how resourceful and intelligent humans might be whatever the time through which they stay.
The smartphone is a form of everyman’s” computational machine, significantly better fitted for the kinds of easy, everyday informational duties that facilitate everyday life and occupy our free time, exterior of the office or school.
A definition of digital reality has all the time been troublesome to formulate — the idea of an alternate existence has been pawed at for centuries — but the closest modern ancestor came to life in the fifties, when a handful of visionaries noticed the chance for watching issues on a display that by no means ends, however the technology wasn’t yet adequate to justify the idea.
As human beings, we have now to figure out easy methods to tempo ourselves and our expectations when there is no temporal backdrop towards which to measure our progress, no narraative via whicch to make sense our actions, no future toward which we may strive, and seemingly no time to figure any of this out.
Moreover, new developments in cognitive science, nano-technology, and digital reality may in the future enable us to transcend what it means to be human right this moment. I guess thus listening to and reading what Watzlaiwich is saying about actuality and time travel is start to slowly sink.